A market-based solution to traffic jams

April 28, 2012

Here in the Seattle area, there are two bridges that take you from the Eastside suburbs, across Lake Washington to the city of Seattle. The bridges are usually jammed during rush hour, with people commuting to work in Seattle or the Eastside (Microsoft and Google are on the Eastside.)

But, for the past few months, one of the bridges, the 520 bridge, has had a toll of 2 to 5 dollars on it, to help pay for its eventual replacement by a new bridge. I now love taking the 520, since it’s now much less congested, and I can afford the toll. But liberals, obviously, hate it:

Technologically, the system is a marvel. There are no tollbooths. Indeed, there is no sign at all that this is a toll road except for actual signs that say so. The toll is collected in myriad ways. You can sign up for an account and get a little coded sticker for your windshield. Or you can wait until they bill you, using your license plate to track you down. Apparently, it works. Unless your commute is between 11 p.m. and 5 a.m., in which case it’s free, you can’t escape.


But the big problem with the new toll is that it is another small chipping away at our shared life as citizens, and another area where money makes the difference. It used to be that no matter how rich you were, there were some things you couldn’t buy your way out of. Rush-hour congestion was one of them. The law, in its majesty, decreed that rich and poor alike would be stuck in traffic. I once heard Steve Ballmer, chief executive of Microsoft and worth many billions of dollars, talking about his strategy for outfoxing the dreaded 520. I tried it. It didn’t work.

As explained by philosopher Michael Walzer, and somewhat more entertainingly by my friend Mickey Kaus (in his book “The End of Equality”), there are two ways to deal with financial inequality (if it bothers you, that is). One is to reduce it, through the tax system. The other is to make money less important. Create national parks, open to everybody. Restore universal military service. And so on.

By this way of thinking, the two bridges side by side, one costly to use and one free, constitute a small step backward, toward making money more important. You might say, wait a minute. What if there already was a toll on both bridges, and it was lifted on one so that people willing to put up with crowds could go across for free? That wouldn’t seem iniquitous, would it? But it’s the same thing, really.

And I would say, great point! Let’s continue this discussion over a drink downtown. And you would look at your watch and say, it’s too late. We’ll never make it across the bridge before dinner time.

4 Responses to A market-based solution to traffic jams

  1. Ryan Aaron on April 28, 2012 at 5:37 pm

    SO is the toll going to be on the new bridge? If not. . then the people getting the benefit are paying for a new bridge everyone gets to use.

  2. David on April 29, 2012 at 1:57 am

    The RINO: I don’t mind big government getting bigger and more expensive so long as I can afford to pay them to have a quicker trip across one of the bridges.

    The LIBERAL: waaaa!! the expensive government bridge beside the free government bridge is “income inequality” and we need to manipulate government to eat the rich.

    The CONSERVATIVE: significantly reduce big government regulations / control and then watch the free market see the obvious demand/opportunity, and then fill that need by constructing a private “pay bridge”, which allows those who can afford it to use it while also decongesting the “free” government bridges.

    Only Conservatives see how to solve both problems, while RINOs and Liberals just make big government bigger and more hostile toward pursuing The American Dream.

  3. Promotional apparel is surely an affordable and effective opportinity
    for marketing your small business and reaching your target audience.
    There could hardly be any benefit inexpensive promotional gift than pens;
    in reality, pens have always been used for branding purposes
    and this may be a believe that corporate organization or panies utilize
    it heavily of their pursuit to produce a brand. Most corporate parties use a business-like ambience the
    ones are expected to behave according to your code of conduct.

  4. Ludie on June 25, 2013 at 3:20 pm

    It offers them an opportunity to observe the item or line may be displayed looked after provides
    the possibility to tell customers about other products which often they might
    ‘t be aware. Visual merchandise could possibly be made immediately next to the checkout because congestion creates an interesting impact about the consumers. No doubt, it now became a very important part in the growth of any businesses.