Is Prince Charles Too Crazy To Be King?

December 20, 2010
By

His writings would certainly indicate so:

The Prince’s new book Harmony is indeed a startling piece of work. He begins it by writing: ‘This is a call to revolution. “Revolution” is a strong word, and I use it deliberately. For more than 30 years I have been ­working to identify the best solutions to the array of deeply entrenched problems we face.

‘Having considered these questions long and hard, my view is that our outlook in the Westernised world has become far too firmly framed by a mechanistic approach to science.’

He continues: ‘This approach is entirely based upon the gathering of the results that come from subjecting physical phenomena to scientific experiment.’

Though the Prince says he does not dismiss all science as bosh, his book is a call to arms against ‘the great juggernaut of industrialisation’ which he deplores.

Some of his phrases are ­messianic: ‘I would be failing in my duty to future generations and to the Earth itself if I did not attempt to point this out and indicate possible ways we can heal the world.’

Obsessively convinced of his own rightness, he views his ­critics with the weary ­resignation of an early Christian martyr: ‘It is probably ­inevitable that if you challenge the ­traditions of conventional thinking you will find yourself accused of naivety.’

Now, you may say it’s a fine thing we have an heir to the throne who cares passionately about the planet and is determined to do something about it. But what if his prescriptions are wrong?

At the heart of the Queen’s brilliant success for almost 60 years is that we have been denied the slightest clue as to what she thinks about anything but dogs and horses. Her passivity has been inspired, because her subjects can then attribute any ­sentiments they choose to her. She has never said a word to raise a hackle.

Prince Charles, by contrast, wears his heart on his sleeve. He outraged the medical ­profession by bullying the last government into providing NHS funding for his cherished homeopathic ­medicine. This, doctors pointed out, meant transferring tax­payers’ money from proven remedies to quackery — panaceas for which there is no scientific evidence at all.

A leading breast cancer ­specialist, Professor Michael Baum, wrote an open letter to the British Medical Journal after the Prince suggested drinking carrot juice and taking coffee bean enemas might help to ­combat cancer.

The Professor furiously wrote that his own 40 years of study and 25 years’ involvement in cancer research might be thought to offer at least as solid a basis for addressing this issue as the Prince’s ‘power and authority, which rest on an ­accident of birth’.

The Government is ­committed to trialling genetically modified crops, which many agriculturalists think offer the best hope of feeding the people of the world. But the Prince repeatedly ­condemns GM as the devil’s work — just as he opposes nuclear power and much ­modern architecture.

We skeptics of Gaiaism and global “warming” would welcome Prince Charles’ coronation as king. We couldn’t ask for a better opponent. His obvious insanity would let us win over millions of people all over the world to our cause.

13 Responses to Is Prince Charles Too Crazy To Be King?

  1. edward on December 20, 2010 at 5:02 pm

    “nutter” I believe is the correct British term

  2. ATTILA on December 20, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    European inbreeding.

  3. invalid10 on December 20, 2010 at 6:02 pm

    test

  4. unclefred on December 20, 2010 at 7:03 pm

    We can be thankful that the royals are no more than entertainment and that once we restore sanity to our own leadership, the bond that we have shared with England can be renewed.

  5. Rogervzv on December 20, 2010 at 7:17 pm

    Thank God we Americans got rid of these aristocratic imbeciles in 1776. What a cretin!

  6. ATTILA on December 20, 2010 at 7:40 pm

    Now to get rid of our own imbeciles .

  7. Retired Naval Officer on December 20, 2010 at 9:18 pm

    Some of those imbeciles include some mushy RINOS.

  8. TheGeezer on December 21, 2010 at 4:46 am

    If only we’d been able to overthrow the entire empire during our revolution!
    I’ve never understood the fascination and wonder many Americans have for the useless royals. I’ve never understood how the Brits put up with that goofy, expensive, silliness.

  9. The Trolls on December 21, 2010 at 10:43 am

    I’ve never understood the fascination and wonder many Americans have for the useless royals.

    Now, now, Jeb would make a fine President.

  10. edward on December 21, 2010 at 8:58 pm

    Or perhaps Hilary Clinton….. except for last name there was a host qualifications, such as…… hmmm help me out here what were her qualifications?

  11. Tera Browe on February 1, 2012 at 5:01 pm

    A standard stroller could be the most typical sort. It has four wheels along with a sturdy frame. Most standard strollers have reclining seats that allow making use of exactly the same unit for your child from infant to toddler. Strollers that convert to vehicle seats are convenient for traveling. The stroller must have top quality suspension to help keep your baby’s ride comfortable and smooth.

  12. noleggio abiti da sposa roma on April 19, 2012 at 5:53 am

    You have a very good blog. For a long time looking for something so wonderful.

  13. Zack Gillard on April 9, 2013 at 7:40 pm

    Thank you for every other informative web site. Where else may I get that kind of information written in such an ideal means?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *