2010 Senate Rankings

September 14, 2010

If Christine O’Donnell were to win today, here’s how I’d rank the likelihood that we’ll take over Democrat-held Senate seats.

5 Responses to 2010 Senate Rankings

  1. Gerry Owen on September 14, 2010 at 8:32 am

    I’d move CA up two notches, but otherwise I agree with your assessment.

    Still think we are hovering around 7-8.

  2. anonymous un-RINO on September 14, 2010 at 8:37 am

    If my eyes don’t mistake me, you ain’t showing a distinct blue tint until seat #13, at the bottom. That is exactly how I have this election pegged.

    Some quibbles: You should likely drop WV down, as it’s just a huge mountain to climb there.

    And move California above Conn, at least, as Conn is just a suburb of New York. But in a true wave election, Cali is gonna blow sky high. Watch for it.

    Unfortunately, you may have to kick Nevada down a bit, as Reid is funded almost beyond comprehension. He’s a bum, but has enough cash to turn Mother Theresa into the Devil, and that just might pull it out for him. I’m guessing not, but still…

  3. phineas gage on September 14, 2010 at 8:42 am

    Nevada nearly has a 15% unemployment rate. It’s foreclosure rate is the highest in the nation.

    I doubt there’s enough cash in the world to get around facts like those. Unless Nevadans are all gullible simpletons.

  4. phineas gage on September 14, 2010 at 8:44 am

    If two out of three in the group of Washington-California-Wisconsin fall, I’ll be satisfied.

    I think Murray will lose.

    Somehow I don’t think Boxer will. More’s the pity.

  5. MikeN on September 14, 2010 at 12:23 pm

    If ODonnell wins, I’d put NY and Oregon ahead of her, as well as probably Vermont and Maryland.