Blog Archives

How the Democrats Destroyed America

October 1, 2015

50 years ago:

Half a century ago, Democrats looked at the country and realized they were never going to convince Americans to agree with them. But they noticed that people in most other countries of the world already agreed with them. The solution was obvious.

So in 1965 — 50 years ago this week — Sen. Ted Kennedy passed an immigration law that has brought 59 million foreigners to our shores, who happen to vote 8-2 for the Democrats.

Democrats haven’t won any arguments; they changed the voters. If anything, the Democrats have stopped bothering to appeal to Americans. The new feminized Democratic Party says, That’s too bad about those steelworkers in Ohio losing their jobs, but THERE’S A WOMAN AT A LAW FIRM IN NEW YORK CITY WHO DESERVES TO MAKE PARTNER!

Republicans should be sweeping the country, but they aren’t, because of Kennedy’s immigration law. Without post-1965 immigrants bloc-voting for the Democrats, Obama never would have been elected president, and Romney would have won a bigger landslide against him in 2012 than Reagan did against Carter in 1980.

This isn’t a guess; it’s a provable fact. Obama beat Romney by less than 5 million votes in a presidential election in which about 125 million votes were cast. More than 30 million of Obama’s votes came from people who arrived under Teddy Kennedy’s immigration law; fewer than 10 million of Romney’s did.

However, this radical demographic change has also had the effect of consolidating the white vote. As I’ve noted over and over and over, as white voters become a minority, they will vote like other minorities do – almost monolithically for a single party.

Is the Marxist Pope Just Following Christ?

September 25, 2015

Non-Christian Fareed Zakaria says yes:

If you want to understand the main message of Jesus Christ, you don’t have to search the Scriptures. He says it again and again. “Blessed be ye poor: for yours is the kingdom of God.”

Jesus has specific advice on how to handle the poor. Treat them as you would Christ himself, sell your possessions and give to the poor. When you hold a banquet, Jesus says, do not invite the wealthy and powerful, because you do so in the hope that they will return the favor and reward you. Instead, invite the dispossessed — and you will be rewarded by God. It is because he expects so much from the rich that he said that it was easier for a camel to get through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get to heaven.

Commentators have taken Francis’s speeches and sayings and attacked him or claimed him as a Marxist, a unionist and a radical environmentalist. I don’t think the pope is proposing an alternative system of politics or economics. He is simply reminding each of us that we have a moral obligation to be kind and generous to the poor and disadvantaged — especially if we have been fortunate. If you have a problem with this message, you have a problem not with Pope Francis, but with Jesus Christ.

I must have missed the sermon where Christ insisted that Christians and non-Christians alike be forced to give their money to the poor at gunpoint. Because that’s what taxes are: If you don’t pay your taxes, no matter how high they are, someone with a gun shows up at your house, and takes you to jail.

The Marxist Pope insists that governments increase taxes. Maybe I missed the sermon where Christ insisted that Herod and the Romans increase tax rates.

Or maybe Christ wasn’t a Marxist after all. Unlike the Pope who won’t mention Christ’s name, even as he heads a church that burnt people alive in Christ’s name.

Boehner’s Parting Shot

September 25, 2015

Apparently, John Boehner’s dream, since he was an altar boy, was to have the pope address Congress. Now that he’s achieved that dream (albeit with a Marxist pope who’s ashamed of Jesus and wants to destroy everything that is good and just in the world), he felt free to retire.

Poll: What Will the Marxist Pope Say to Congress?

September 24, 2015

What will the Marxist Pope say to Congress?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

UPDATE: He didn’t mention Jesus. Not even once.

Saudi Arabia to Behead and Crucify Dissident

September 24, 2015

Marxist Pope Meets American Prisoners, But Not Cuban Prisoners

September 23, 2015

Laughs with fellow Marxists while political prisoners rot, says… WaPo!!!

I Agree With the Iranian President!

September 20, 2015

He says “Death to America” isn’t a literal chant, and that’s true.

Just as the French and Spanish chant “vive” and “viva”, meaning “long live”, Middle-Easterners chant “long live” in their languages. The opposite of “long live” is… “death to”.

The meaning is lost in translation. People who chant “Death to [insert name here]!” aren’t literally calling for that person or organization’s death. For example, the chant is routinely used during worker strikes against their employers. A better translation of “Death to America” would be “Down with America!”

Quote of the Day

September 18, 2015

Liberal Republican presidential candidate John Kasich, on Hispanics:

“A lot of them do jobs that they’re willing to do and, uh, that’s why in the hotel you leave a little tip.”

Don’t worry. Like Kelly Osbourne, Kasich is definitely not RACIST.

Richard Sherman, Voice of Reason?

September 17, 2015

The Seahawks’ unbeatable cornerback has a good head on his shoulders:

The Seahawks cornerback said he is not the author of a post written by someone using the pseudonym RSherman25. The post was a reaction to an image of Sherman and Marshawn Lynch with text that promoted killing “KKKrakas,” which was created by activist King Noble.

“There were some points in that post that were relevant and I could agree with,” Sherman said in a news conference on Wednesday. “But there were also some ignorant points in there.”

The post says King Noble is “what is keeping and making the black race look bad,” and calls out Noble who, last month, said it was “open season on killing whites and white police officers.”

Sherman said he does believe black lives matter. There is a “way” to go about showing this, other than violence, he said. Sherman, whose best friend was killed by two other black men, said the problem doesn’t just lie with police and white people.

“I didn’t hear anyone else shouting black lives matter then,” he said of the murder of his friend.


September 17, 2015

Is the top word voters associate with Hillary Clinton:

As part of a late-August poll tracking the verbatim responses of Americans to the names of all U.S. presidential candidates, Gallup spoke with 750 adults familiar enough with Hillary Clinton to give an opinion. 329 of them replied with either “e-mail,” “e-mail scandal,” “private e-mail,” or some other variation.

Another 83 respondents mentioned the word “server,” a reference to the private server on which Clinton is accused of improperly storing classified government documents. Altogether, more than half of those surveyed thought immediately of the e-mail scandal when presented with Clinton’s name. (“Benghazi,” the Libyan city where four Americans were killed, touching off another Clinton scandal, was a popular alternate response.)

The Truth About “Mass Incarceration”

September 16, 2015

It has little to do with “non-violent drug offenses”:

Prison growth has been driven mainly by violent and property crime, not drugs. As Fordham law professor John Pfaff has shown, more than half of the extra prisoners added in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s were imprisoned for violent crimes; two thirds were in for violent or property crimes. Only about a fifth of prison inmates are incarcerated for drug offenses, and only a sliver of those are in for marijuana. Moreover, many of these incarcerated drug offenders have prior convictions for violent crimes. The median state prisoner serves roughly two years before being released; three quarters are released within roughly six years.

For the last several decades, arrest rates as a percentage of crimes — including drug arrests — have been basically flat, as have sentence lengths. What has driven prison populations, Pfaff proves convincingly, is that arrests are far more likely to result in felony charges: Twenty years ago, only three eighths of arrests resulted in felony charges, but today more than half do. Over the past few decades, prosecutors have grown tougher and more consistent.

College Student Writes 800-Word Op-ed About Being Oppressed By the Patriarchy All Day

September 10, 2015

“I go to class. We are discussing Islam in modern society. I chime in. A neighbor, who identifies as male, leans over from across the aisle: ‘You can’t be pretty and smart.’ He thinks he’s giving me a compliment. There is an awkward pause as he waits for me to meekly deny my sexuality. I do not comply. He turns away. I’m not sure he actually listened to anything I said.”

The horror!

(via NRO)

Is The West Dead Yet?

September 8, 2015

Victor Davis Hanson states what everyone knows, but will not say:

Westerners are hoist on their own petards of “fairness” and “equality” in the age of globalization and instant communications: If Sudanese or Oaxacans are deprived of free annual check-ups or are in need of climate-change instruction, then Brussels and Washington are just as culpable for their plight as if they had shorted their own Slovakians or Alabamans.

Elites who are exempt by virtue of their money and influence from the consequences of living among millions of displaced Africans, Arabs, or Latin Americans berate ad nauseam their less-well-connected, supposedly illiberal fellow citizens. But note that no elite Westerner wants to face the cause of the malady: namely, that the failure in the Third World to adopt Western ideas of consensual government, equality between the sexes, free-market capitalism, individual liberty, and transparent meritocracy logically leads to mayhem and poverty.

Westerners are afraid to explain why the non-West suffers and what it might do to end its own miseries. To do that would be imperialistic and neo-colonial.

Read the whole thing.

Poll: Hillary Now Losing To… Everybody

September 6, 2015

Trump Now Beating All Democrats

September 5, 2015

Why is this important? Because, for the first time, a Democrat win in 2016 doesn’t seem inevitable anymore.